By The Numbers Again Dept.


Look no further for  perfect example of the problems I have with template-driven storytelling than some recent movie remake news:

Remake Bits: ‘Sympathy For Mr. Vengeance,’ ‘Poltergeist’ Plot, ‘Seven Samurai’ Hints | /Film

... [here are] some details of the Poltergeist remake script, by David Lindsay-Abaire. It doesn’t sound like a straight re-do of the original film. Rather, it features a family headed by a guy named Eric Bowen. He loses his job, after which he and his family “relocate to a new town to start anew. His daughter, Madison, is abducted, making him truly understand what’s important in life: family. In the new version, Eric’s wife, Amy, can communicate with the dead.”

First off, the mere fact that they are remaking Poltergeist —  not to mention Sympathy for Mr. Vengeancenor Seven Samurai  — is insult enough. Well, even there I'm willing to bend a bit: Seven Samurai did get remade as The Magnificent Seven, and if we're going to remake Korean cinema we might as well aim high, right? (See my comments about the Oldboy remake.)

But let me zoom in on the real irk-maker — the bit about how having his daughter kidnapped "[makes] him truly understand what's important in life: family." Is there one single movie in the past thirty years that hasn't pounded this treacly lesson into us a dozen different ways, along with a whole slew of others (follow your dreams, break the rules, listen to your heart, kiss the girl, etc. etc.)?

It's not that those lessons aren't worth learning, but the whole ready-made-concept deployment makes them into mere story ingredients. You cannot manufacture moral lessons that have any real weight, and you sure as hell aren't going to be able to do them in the context of a cynical remake of a Hollywood property. The lessons, such as they are, have to be an organic outgrowth of what happens and why. They cannot be siphoned off and transfused into a story as a way to give life to something that's dead on its feet from the git-go.

My counter-example of choice is Ikiru, Akira Kurosawa's film about a dying public servant who decides, for the first time in his life, to do something more than just take up space. When he finds he's dying of stomach cancer, he at first tries to distract himself through dissolution, then commits to helping a group of local housewives convert a smelly bit of reclaimed land into a playground. The movie shakes people up, because its very construction forces us to see how the rest of the world regards his dying gestures as a lunatic frivolity.

This is a classic example of a great movie from which you can extract a treacly moral ("follow your dream"). Do that and you're left with nothing but, well, a treacly moralism. Without the movie — its characters, its look and feel, its writing, and so on — to surround it and give it context and heft, you don't have a story. You have a fortune cookie. Nobody wants to spend $12 on something they can get free with their dumplings and pork fried rice.


Tags: Akira Kurosawa Hollywood movies remakes storytelling




About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Serdar in the category Uncategorized / General, published on May 25, 2013 10:00 AM.

You can see alphabetical or chronological listings of all entries in this category.

» See other Uncategorized / General entries for the month of May 2013.

» See all other entries for the month of May 2013.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

About Me

I'm an independent SF and fantasy author, technology journalist, and freelance contemplator for how SF can be made into something more than just a way to blow stuff up.

My Goodreads author profile.

Learn some more about me.

My Books

Coming Soon

Out Now

More of my books

Search This Site


Other People We Like

Fandom

Archives