Shin Gendai Ryoukiden is a despicable bag of garbage with no reason to exist save to cater to the lowest impulses of its audience. It claims to be (at least in part) a fictionalization of several stories of the “true-crime” variety, but I wasn’t fooled. No one read True Detective magazine because they wanted to get a better idea of how law enforcement really worked, and they’re not going to read this to have any light shed on the various criminal acts detailed within. Its sole purpose is to show sexualized sadism, gore, torture, and murder, with the disclaimer that it was “based on true events” as spice.
What, indeed, are the limits for this sort of thing? I wasn’t offended by the gory violence in Dario Argento’s movies, nor the sadism in Salo, nor even the over-the-top splatter of Riki-oh. Part of it is because, I suspect, none of those movies dealt with something that allegedly happened; they were fiction. I don’t find porn offensive, either, because it usually deals with good times between consenting adults (and this book most decidedly does not). Yes, I was offended by Ichi the Killer, because it contained things I could barely stomach in any context — the same mixture of sadism and sexuality that Shin Gendai Ryoukiden seems to wallow in under the pretext of being “factual.”
I am all too aware that there are people — mostly teenagers, from what I can tell — who get off on this sort of stuff, who ogle it not because they themselves have fantasies to slake about torture and murder, but because it represents something forbidden. Just being able to see something that’s specifically not for you is in itself titillating. I suspect that there may be a few of them who will read this and hit up their buddies to find a copy of this book, and I doubt I could stop them by not writing about it. Maybe I sound passé just taking the time to tell people how I feel it is debased and degenerate, but believe me, I have my reasons.
Shin Gendai Ryoukiden translates to something like Modern-Day True-to-Life Stories of the Bizarre. At least half of the book is taken up with a retelling, in lurid comic-book form, of a horrific incident that did indeed take place in Japan in 1989. If it were wholly fictional, disclaimers aside, I might not have been so offended, but they went through the trouble of invoking the specter of the event themselves. The second half deals with a couple of mostly unverifiable true-crime tidbits done in equally poor taste, and the last few chapters are entirely fictional but no less repugnant for their inclusion here.
Recent Comments